I told
myself that I would stay away from politics for a while on my blog, then
politics reared its ugly head. I find it
unfortunate that within a week’s time, Paula Deen, whose primary sin is promoting
food that that is part of an unhealthy lifestyle, has been vilified in the
media for admitting to having used the “N” word in the past while in Washington, D.C. the legal system has made racism more acceptable. Paula Deen became a
scapegoat for a nation still living with institutionalized racism even as the
Supreme Court issued a decision that eviscerates the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Now we can
all eat our fried chicken and pecan pie, AND keep minorities away from the
polls. I have one question: Which is worse, to long for the days of plantations
and minstrel shows, or to legalize the disregarding of the Voting Rights Act? Okay, both are pretty lame and both reveal an innate, perhaps unconscious racism. Paula Deen finds black servants in white coats and gloves appealing as a quaint
look at an idealized past. The U.S Supreme Court has just allowed for disenfranchisement
of minorities in the basic right of American citizens to vote. But no one on the Supreme Court used the “N”
word. They just made it easier for minorities to be treated as that which we
are uncomfortable in naming. The Supreme Court decision allows the country to continue with its institutionalized racism while giving lip service to racial progress by shunning Paula Deen.
A couple of
years ago I quoted Will Campbell in a blog post discussing a new “revised” version
of Huckleberry Finn. It had to do
with the use of the “N” word vs. how we actually treat people:
Sometimes we educated folk can get so caught
up in political correctness that we end up missing the point entirely, living
in a dull, flat landscape, so to speak. It reminds me of something Will
Campbell relates in his acclaimed memoir, Brother to a Dragonfly. Campbell tells of a salty Baptist preacher,
Brother Thad Garner, he knew in the Deep South. One of his stories is about how
Brother Garner used his influence in the local Lion’s Club to make them aware
that it was wrong to support a bond issue for a swimming pool in their town
when earlier a bond had been defeated that would have provided running water
for those living in the Black community (who were having to draw water from a
single well). This was a decade prior to the civil rights movement. Brother
Thad had first warmed up the crowd with some jokes, including one about an “ole
colored preacher.” After the meeting, Will chided his friend for telling “ole
colored preacher" jokes. To which his friend Thad replied:
“That’s
the trouble with you shithook liberals, Willie. You had rather see a hundred
children die of dehydration than to have the sound of ‘nigger’ heard from your
lips. Whether I say ‘nigger’ don’t matter a damn. If one of those young’uns die
of thirst he ain’t nothing. Just one more dead nigger, whether I say the word
or not, or whether I go to Hell for saying it or not. But if he lives to get
grown, maybe he can lead his people out of this godawful Egypt and there won’t
be no more niggers."
May the
Supreme Court justices enjoy their fried chicken and pecan pie which will
probably be prepared by some people who won’t quite make it to the polls next
time. As the song
says, “Not dark yet…but it’s gettin’ there.
I also have to say that we must keep carrying on. Sometimes justice can still prevail if we persevere, as in this decision from a previous Supreme Court:
ReplyDeleteDred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), also known as the Dred Scott Decision, was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. It made two main rulings. The first ruling was that African Americans were not citizens, and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court. The second ruling was that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in any territory acquired after the creation of the United States. (from Wikipedia)